Tag Archives: Apple

Why You Shouldn’t Buy a Mac for Linux.

Why You Shouldn’t Buy a Mac for Linux.

Meanwhile, on the Fediverse, I found this.

Buy a Mac! Run Linux on the piece of shit! It’ll be FUN!

Just when I got done complaining about the Lenovo firmware garbage, with just two examples, Apple proves why they’re not a real option.

In the more serious of these two cases, they can’t even reliably update RecoveryOS, which is sort of like the “Recovery WIM” partition in Windows-land. It’s where you usually end up if your computer is fucked, and I think it can do some things to repair macOS or get a fresh copy on your computer by downloading one from Apple.

The trouble with Apple’s buggy software is that when they screw up RecoveryOS it’s no longer safe to install Asahi Linux, and it wouldn’t be able to recover macOS either, likely, and you’d have to just take it to an Apple store and hope they do something for you.

Maybe even charge you even though it was because of their bug.

There are many bugs in Apple products, especially their most recent releases, and a lot of these are firmware bugs. They’re in there using the “Apple Tax” on their shareholder dividends and marketing, and I really don’t think their computers are a lot higher quality than a Lenovo.

And it was these Asahi Linux people that were a major push for Rust support in the Linux kernel. Almost the only project using it much is to get Apple hardware working, when all of the effort is most likely futile anyway. Apple has gone from m68k, to ppc, to x86, to arm, and if they want to do it again they will.

They don’t support anything. Even when they were on x86, they pointlessly dropped 32-bit x86 application support for no reason. If you say something is the way to run programs, you ought to support it for decades unless it was simply so horrible it’s impossible to live with.

Apple didn’t have to do that to their Intel Mac customers, they just dropped it with no warning a few years ahead of getting off x86 because they’re Apple.

Things like this, and all of these ridiculous bugs, are why Apple computers will never be anything beyond a joke.

They pissed Ken Thompson (one of the inventors of UNIX, and C) off enough to just move from a Mac to Linux on a Raspberry Pi, and that’s before the RPi 5 came out with 4 times as much processing power, double the RAM, and better graphics.

Once you put Linux on a Mac, you’ve still got a bad computer.

The drivers are reverse engineered, and do not support the majority of Linux applications. They are particularly deficient in graphics, where you’re stuck with OpenGL ES.

Not even real OpenGL. Just a deprecated subset that might be useful for a dumb Android phone game. On a desktop, almost completely useless except maybe for desktop effects.

From my understanding, you don’t get real OpenGL, and you sure as Hell don’t get Vulkan. The hardware may not even support Vulkan.

In my testing with Intel Xe GPUs, the Vulkan renderers on games usually run in the ballpark of twice as fast as the OpenGL ones.

You couldn’t run really expect to run Yuzu, the Nintendo Switch emulator, on OpenGL ES on Linux on a Mac.

First off, they’d have to write a new renderer, then they’d have to port the program itself to the M series CPUs, and it’s a pretty tall order, and is likely to happen on some new RPi before a Mac ever becomes a viable development target.

Someone asked about Yuzu on a Mac with Linux, and the answer was “Port it yourself. There’s source code.” and that’s where the conversation stopped. I run Yuzu every day almost, on a 2020 Lenovo laptop.

People who develop Linux programs like these do it because they’re using hardware that is a development target. So when you buy a Mac to run Asahi, you’ve got something you can’t even use for use cases that someone might target Mac OS itself for.

Some people have asked about getting rid of the macOS entirely and running Linux as the only OS.

From what I’ve gathered from the developers, this is possible, but they strongly advise against it. You can’t update the Mac’s firmware without macOS, so they recommend resizing the macOS partition which means it’s wasting some of the disk even if you never boot into macOS for anything.

While not being able to update PC firmware after you get rid of Windows, this isn’t usually a big problem. If your computer’s in warranty to where the manufacturer has to support a fucked BIOS update or doing something so outrageous you can’t live with it, you update it once on the way out the door and generally never have to do it again. Linux will work.

On an “Apple Silicon” Mac, system firmware is a much much larger problem.

From the description of it I have from Asahi developers, I understand that you may be required to use macOS to update the Mac’s firmware (1) so that you can update Linux at all past a certain point, or (2) so you can use some feature (like more OpenGL ES features) at some future date, which may not be usable without a firmware update.

So you’ve basically got an expensive pet rock that’s even more of a nightmare to deal with than a PC. And in return, you get all these Apple bugs and less software.

When they don’t think PC users are listening, the Mac heads bitch and moan about bad design that’s pissing them off. Even JWZ does it, but for some reason thinks Linux is stuck with the same issues he experienced in 2008.

The Mac is, sadly, not an option for Linux. If anything, it is polluting and bloating Linux with a meme language that people are using to write garbage with, and that could metastasize and become a problem for Linux later on.

This is why I briefly considered buying a Mac and then talked myself out of it. You’ll never actually free it from the really awful OS it came with like you can with a PC, it’s ungodly expensive, and it’s got more laughable Linux support than a $100 RPi 5 computer I can buy at an electronics store in Chicago.

What’s unbelievable, to me, is how much Apple has regressed from the point my editor, Howard, was sending me “Mac-formatted” floppies in the late 90s, and that people want to use Linux on this.

Google Announces End of Support for Ogg Theora. Cites “Zero Day Security Issues” in Media Codecs; Forgets to Mention Their Own Codecs are the Problem.

Google Announces End of Support for Ogg Theora. Cites “Zero Day Security Issues” in Media Codecs; Forgets to Mention Their Own Codecs are the Problem.

Google has announced the “end of support” for Ogg Theora.

They claim it’s not widely used.

Wikipedia is one site that used it extensively, but Google moles are filling the site up with Googleisms so that nobody can access parts of Wikipedia without support for media codecs which have had some of the worst security disasters ever found in media codecs lately. libvpx and WebP, both Google formats.

There’s only 5 security vulnerabilities in the MITRE CVE database that even mention Theora, and the last one was in 2011.

Meanwhile, Google’s libvpx has 24 and its WebP image format has 34.

There isn’t really anything to prove Google’s claim that there is some imminent danger from Theora. It’s a much simpler and well-written codec. It’s also been around longer.

Google has, however, proven that it proliferates new formats, is incapable or unwilling to properly debug, them and then by the time they even start to get used on the Web, they’re off to something else.

There’s a lot of media codec attack surface in Chrome and that’s mainly because of Google adding new formats that are pointlessly different.

It’s also not clear at all that AV1 or WebM are free of legal dangers.

When the MPEG-LA threatened everyone using VP8 (a Google format), Google quietly paid them off so they would shut up. Who even knows what the REAL situation is with AV1 and WebM? Google won’t tell you.

The only thing we do know is that they’re way less than 20 years old and by the time patent trolls come out of the woodwork and start suing everyone over them, Google will have made sure that nobody can go back to using Theora even if they want to.

There is no longer a functioning W3C.

Years ago, Apple convinced them to drop Theora from the HTML 5 standard because the truth is that Theora is nearly as high quality as h264, but they were doubtful even in 2010 that they could sue over it.

Now we get to deal with Google’s “Intent to Ship” notices instead of Web standards that anyone can implement.

Also, as reported by Google, Mozilla is discussing, privately, whether to drop Theora.

Whether they do or not is irrelevant because basically nobody uses Gecko anymore, and even if they do, it’s irrelevant because it is developed behind closed doors, by a company that is as independent of Google as Belarus is of Russia.

Gecko is also not “true open source”. You can compile a version yourself, but all the development decisions happen behind closed doors. It’s more like “source available”, but the fork control is that you’ll never make significant improvements to the code and keep up with them. Like, Pale Moon even admits, again, that it will have to rebase and lose Unified XUL Platform.

No discussion is tolerated on Mozilla Bugzilla.

They use Google Groups marked Private (no mailing lists), they don’t even have IRC anymore.

Mozilla is hopelessly fucked and anyone saying it is not is delusional, and with all three people that still use their pile of spyware and adware, they have no power to enforce any decisions they even try to make to go another way with the Web platform.

Firefox and Gecko effectively ceased to exist a long time ago, in the sense that anything Mozilla does even matters.

For the last ten years, they were an investment Google made in case of an Anti-Trust trial, which is going on now. The search royalties made less and less sense as all of the Firefox users left, but they make perfect sense in a “We’ll prop you up as long as you don’t do anything to really get in our way and smile for the judge.” way.

They’re comparable to a nearly bankrupt and ruined Apple being reanimated by Microsoft in the 90s to say they had some really terrible competition for Windows, but it was something you could use.

Even I gave up and moved to Brave, which rips out and modifies a lot of the pollution that Google’s ad business throws into Chrome.

Theora is not a bad codec.

It runs faster on the decode side than h264, the code is decent, and it does almost as well (post-Thusnelda improvements) as h264 in coding efficacy.

Google is projecting all of the design mistakes, patent mess, and security holes in its own projects on something that has never had any huge problems.

I would have been happy if Theora and Ogg Vorbis became widely used, but the problem with technologies like these is it’s whatever the porn and pirate scene do that gets the codecs out there and widely used. MP3 would have failed without pirates, and the pirates are basically pushing HEVC and AAC now.

To be sure, Google does deserve some credit. Things could be much worse if HEVC ever made it onto the Web, and I’m not talking about some server that sends it to Safari, because honestly, who cares?

Google could have just paid the extortion within the context of Chrome and let it get out there and become a huge mess for everyone.

The compression efficacy of HEVC is actually not that much better than h264, but the patent mess is designed to basically go on forever when h264 patents are dying by the hundreds and closer to the end.

The CPU requirements if you have no hardware decode on HEVC are also very very bad, and the encode times are also very bad even with reasonable hardware.

My favorite thing about Theora was mainly just how fast it had CPU decode even in 2004.

Nobody designs these modern codecs to be simple, they design them to do stupid pointless things to get patents, and then you have to live with that. They’ve always done this to some extent, like MP3, but it’s gotten out of control so that they can get 50,000 patents.

Who wants to use software that was designed to waste their processing resources to make it more patentable? I don’t.

Bing has decided to delete all the porn and this has made it to DuckDuckGo and Qwant.

It looks like Bing has decided to delete all the **** and this has made it to DDG and Qwant. Truly a sad day for the 4% of the Web.

Here we see the very “independent” totally “has an index” and a “DuckDuck Bot” DuckDuckGo proving how “independent” it is by…….returning whatever Bing does, yet again. Very “independent”. Very independent. Much Wow. (And “DuckDuckBot”.)

Another thing I noticed after this was brought to my attention is that Microsoft Bing is now using Dark Patterns to get you to accidentally use the Bullshit Bot that returns malware.

They’ve put a “Chat” button right in front of where you click to get the next page of search results, then they made the next button smaller and moved it off to the left.

Are they getting desperate?

One can only speculate about why they decided to start nuking all the porn, while Google still returns reams and reams of the stuff.

There was chatter about trying to offload the Bing Lemon onto Apple.

And as we all know, Apple goes around, like a group of mobsters, site to site, app to app, threatening everyone to delete the porn or there will be….trouble.

A few years after ruining Tumblr, Apple went and roughed up Reddit. Now Reddit is complying (at least on New Reddit) by shoving a QR code in your face and telling you the porn is only available in their App, which spies on your entire phone (as most Apps that are on the Play Store do…I barely even open the stupid thing….use F-Droid) and displays advertising, so you can “anonymously” view the porn.

If Microsoft is looking to offload their Lada onto Apple, this would be a good place to start.

Google isn’t looking to get acquired by anyone.

Unlike Microsoft, with their pathetic 3% of the search market, laying off most of the “Bing developers” and relying on a Bullshit Bot full of propaganda and malvertising that is deflating as we speak, Google has a business that makes money.

In the post I wrote, previously, and linked to earlier, about the Social Credit Scores taking effect in America, and the censored search engines, it looks like the next thing you won’t be allowed to know about is legal pornography.

It was probably inevitable given the trajectory of the manually blacklisted results. If they could do this with with people’s Web forums and Bittorrent sites, who didn’t think they’d get around to this one next?

As much as it horrifies me to point this out, Americans may have to start asking Yandex (a Russian search engine) about things. Granted, it’s not ideal to rely on something Russian that’s got a lot of CAPTCHAs, but at least they don’t do requests from the American censors.

I would think that the American censors would be smart enough to at least realize that porn is one of the few escapes a lot of people have from our country rotting and falling down around us. Maybe they don’t care about distractions anymore and feel it’s safe to mess with the formula and rely completely on threatening to hurt people.

Looking at mp3HD, the “Lossless” MP3 Format Nobody Ever Used.

Looking at mp3HD, the “Lossless” MP3 Format Nobody Ever Used.

I came across the Wikipedia article for mp3HD again and tried to clean it up somewhat.

In doing it, I actually looked at what a horrible format this was. As another harebrained scheme to “extend” MP3 and keep extracting royalties on it somehow, Thomson (Technicolor) (Now bankrupt.) and Fraunhofer Society (amusingly, my spell correct wanted to call them the Fraudster Society) collaborated to create a “lossless MP3 file” format about a decade after FLAC and WavPack already existed.

FLAC is proposed as an IETF standard as of 2019, but whether it becomes one or not, even Microsoft and Apple support them, which means it’s not only mainstream, but it supplanted their attempts at a proprietary lossless audio codec too. (Windows Media Audio Lossless and Apple Lossless).

In the end, Apple gave up and made Apple Lossless open source, after it had been reverse engineered anyway. Apple Lossless takes 400% more CPU time to decode than FLAC, compresses the files less, and has no official way to do error checking.

Although I suppose you could hack it in by running md5sum on each file, then adding it as a comment on the tags. It still wouldn’t be as good as FLAC or Wavpack’s because you couldn’t just ask the playback software to check and compare, and you’d need to store two values. One for the source file and one for the ALAC file (to make sure you could verify the source if you were to unpack it later).

Windows Media Audio Lossless has even more problems. I’ve actually only encountered that one once and ended up reading the data out into WavPack with the help of FFMpeg. I did a checksum verification on both ends and they matched. Then I never looked at WMAL again.

But mp3HD was a terrible codec. I’ve never actually used it, but I have read the specification. I think I played around with the encoder once to see if it could easily make standard MP3 files like the “MP3 Surround” encoder could, but they took that feature out.

The marketing tagline was “It’s time to preserve your music forever.”, and apparently “forever” was the two years it took Thomson/Technicolor and their Patent Troll Pals at FhG to give up on the format, forever.

mp3HD took advantage of the fact that you “can” shove up to 256 MB of arbitrary data into an ID3v2 tag, but just because you can doesn’t mean you should. They also claimed that the part of the file that was a lossy MP3 would play on anything that supported regular MP3 files. Which was a lie.

Why was shoving arbitrary data into an ID3 file a bad idea?

Well, tagging software.

If the user edited the actual comments in the tag, or the tag itself, the lossless data could become corrupt or lost entirely since MP3 with a tag is essentially two files in one.

The tag piggybacks the end or the front of the file (depending on the version) in an otherwise empty frame or series of frames.

So the mp3HD codec simply packed non-MP3 data into empty MP3 frames of an arbitrary length misusing a possible field in the ID3 tag (not to exceed the 256 MB tag size limit).

The actual MP3 part of the file was now just a standard MP3 using whatever encoding settings the person who made the “mp3HD” file selected.

So there was a huge potential for data loss. Edit the wrong field or accidentally rewrite the tag, bye bye lossless data correction.

Further, since this is undefined behavior by the ID3 specification (the closest thing to data you are supposed to put into one, officially, is album art), player software is free to interpret the data in the tag pretty much however it wants to. It’s not standard MP3 data, so it won’t play audio, but what it did do, in mplayer at least, was play the lossy MP3 followed by an additional 40 minutes of silence, according to a person on Hydrogen Audio.

The 256 MB limit in the ID3 tag means that your limit for the file is roughly 38 minutes in CD quality (16/44.1), which immediately means no “one huge file with .cue” like you can do with WavPack and FLAC. It also was limited to 16-bit / 48 kHz source, like MP3 was, so no native ability to directly deal with “High Res” sources. Also, if you used 16/48 then your time limit per file would probably drop to half an hour.

(Coincidentally, 38 minutes is the amount of time a Stargate can be connected without a ZPM plugged in, or a black hole on the other side, or the overload weapon used by Anubis, or a planet full of Naquadah melting down around it.)

So given the potential for data loss (due to the abuse of the ID3 tag), the larger size than FLAC or WavPack, the inability to use Hybrid Lossless (like WavPack’s lossy .wv with a lossless correction .wvc in the same folder) meant that you couldn’t break them apart and just put the lossy section on your portable device, there’s already no point in even trying to use something like this.

The fact that most devices only played MP3 in standard quality meant you’d waste at least three times the storage space vs. the quality of playback you received.

When you could have just put a FLAC file on the device and listened to it in lossless in exchange for all the space it uses.

That’s also if the thing even worked at all and didn’t attempt to read the non-MP3 data in the tag and play 40 minutes of static per file between every track.

Looking at this format, it’s hard to even think how they thought this would work or what tortured mind this even came out of. But we can be glad that it didn’t succeed.

As usual, proprietary software companies and patent trolls like to come to the party a decade late and re-implement something that already exists, badly.

My father used to work for RCA as an electrical engineer.

After GE purchased the company, it really went to Hell. No longer were they an innovative company that at least stood a chance against the Japanese.

GE sold the RCA consumer electronics division to the French (Thomson/Technicolor) who did not take good care of it. They ceded a decade of potential innovation (the 90s) to the Japanese, outsourced product manufacturing to Mexico, hired my dad back as a contractor who lived in Mexico at more than his previous salary had been, and then finally fired the Mexicans and sold the “brands” to the Chinese.

After this, they became a patent troll that was living large on MP3 royalties, and after the patents expired in the US they were sunk, and declared bankruptcy in France, followed by Chapter 15 Bankruptcy in the United States. I think all that’s left of them now is some motion picture stuff.

It’s just simply unbelievable how incompetent the French were with RCA. They destroyed an American icon and managed to blow up the French company a little later on.

Going back to MP3, the standard didn’t actually specify DRM.

Actually, it didn’t even specify a tagging format, so the only official use of the ID3 tag from Thomson/Technicolor and FhG was to violate the specification with mp3HD.

(You can also use APEv2 tags in an MP3.)

There were “potential helpers” for some DRM to be added to MP3s later, like the Copyright Bit (which pirated ones always said “No”, of course) and the people who did the ID3 specification left a comment field to indicate what DRM scheme was in use.

But by the time anyone may have wanted to add this, Microsoft and Apple already had their preferred formats anyway and they came with DRM. Apple extended MPEG-4 Audio (AAC) with a digital restrictions scheme called “FairPlay” and Microsoft had one for Windows Media Audio (WMA) called “Janus”.

Since I despise DRM, I always called them FoulPlay and Anus DRM when I was talking about them. In my last post, I mentioned my reaction to the iTunes Store in 2004, and it was to delete it immediately and refuse to ever touch it again.

Apparently, “FairPlay” means you allegedly bought something but when you try to play it in your preferred software it doesn’t work, then you find out you have to buy an iPod and “manage your licenses” with iTunes, and that’s totally not something I was ever interested in doing.

The MP3 format, for all its many technical and legal flaws, nobody ever bothered to restrict it like this.

You can still purchase them at Amazon without DRM and there’s none of this “FoulPlay and Anus” stuff controlling what you do and eventually taking the file back from you without a refund.

But Amazon is not your pal. Their Kindle Store works exactly like “FoulPlay and Anus”, and the Free Software Foundation took to calling it the Amazon “Swindle”.

Comments on a 2008 Richard Stallman Interview and Why Some People Don’t Value Free Software.

I came across this Richard Stallman interview from 2008, in New Zealand.

The interviewer asked him why he felt the Free Software Movement was so strong in some countries and not in others. He said “I don’t know.”

I’d say that it’s worth speculating.

I can’t speak for the entire world, but I know that the United States has gotten a lot worse in the last 30 years in almost every conceivable way, because I was around to witness the country I grew up in and what it’s like now, and the gradual decay from Point A to Point B.

When you instill incorrect values into one person, you can get a narcissistic spoiled brat that is very unintelligent and socially awkward, and then they become a terrible adult.

In isolation, this can be a problem you see occasionally in every society.

But Extreme Capitalism benefits from this because unintelligent people can’t think in terms of how badly they’re being exploited, and why their long term goals and survival should take priority over getting the latest iPhone.

When the COVID “lockdowns” happened, and the government would only let you shop at places that sold food, I saw Walmart get a lot bigger.

The government, through this decree (strangely without any enabling laws, but who needs laws at this point?), helped them eliminate a lot of competition, or severely weaken it.

Best Buy, for example, had to shut down because they sell TVs and computers and appliances, but not food. Walmart sold food, but the non-food sections didn’t have to shut down.

Many people I saw were lined up, during a pandemic, where they were all told to stay in their homes because of something that could kill them, they lined up across the store, to spend COVID “stimulus checks” on new TVs, because that’s how they were “educated”.

Not, “Jesus Christ! 25 million people just lost their jobs! I’d better save this!”, but “Eh, fuck the landlord, he can’t throw me out this month. Throw the working TV set in the neighbor’s lawn, kids! We’re getting a bigger one!”

How can a society of people like this, who don’t even appreciate what’s unfolding in front of them or where it could lead next month, possibly appreciate Free Software?

They don’t think in terms of Freedom anymore. They aren’t allowed to. They weren’t educated to. It doesn’t help the people who run this place.

Frankly, I’m happy that the situation is not worse than it is now. But even where we are at now, where you approach someone and they laugh at you while they’re doing stupid things in regards to their computing, is bad.

People have been taught to think of people who don’t do bad things for themselves, or who try to plan for the future, as “cranks”. It took me a while of using Windows to finally say “This is enough. I’ve had it. This thing is getting worse every release. Every few years, they attack something I’ve done before and it stops now!”. Around the time Vista came out.

At some point, I may have to look at some really weird hardware options to even keep running Free Software thanks to Microsoft and Intel locking down my computers. (“Secure Boot”)

The other day, I said to someone, “You know, I don’t use Google Chrome. If you sign in, it will hurt you more, but if you have it on your computer at all, it is hurting you.”

How many people should need to go to jail over things they said on Facebook or Web searches after they logged in and personally identified themselves to Google, over their real IP address, in a browser that saves everything in a history file, which it also uploads to Google? All of their passwords to Google. All their dirty laundry to Google. (Or Microsoft with Edge, etc.)

Jail over things like abortions that were legal for over 50 years and up to 14 months ago in every State.

The major reason that modern browsers want you to log into the browser is so that beacons from advertising/tracking companies (Microsoft/Google) can follow you around the Web and attach what you do on most sites to your Google or Microsoft account, where you are also having your searches logged.

You don’t need to do much to become an Enemy of The State in America these days.

Just become unable to work (even through retirement), or get an abortion and refuse to give them more slaves in the future.

This truly is a hop, skip, and a jump away from the Nazi euthanasia program, only Joe Biden is allowing fentanyl to hit the streets so people can pay 50 cents to unburden the State from their existence.

Eventually, you’ll see Biden’s retirement plan for you, which is COVID and fentanyl, or you’ll be placed in a nice shiny set of handcuffs.

In the early 2000s, Bill Gates said he imagined that eventually you’d just log in to a computer and every setting would just apply to the computer for you.

Whether it’s Windows or Chrome or Microsoft Edge, this is not something they do, for free, to make your computing better. It’s designed as a malicious backdoor.

Occasionally exporting your passwords and bookmarks to storage you control isn’t difficult.

Hell, my SeaMonkey profile has been updated by me, by hand, several times now. That’s not the most straightforward process, but it’s still by no means impossible.

The other day I imported the current state of my Brave bookmarks and passwords into SeaMonkey “the long way” by exporting them from Brave into LibreWolf, then when they were in a “Mozilla” format, I copied over the key4.db, logins.json in and started the browser. Then deleted all my bookmarks from SeaMonkey and imported the bookmarks.html I exported from Brave.

Thankfully, I don’t need to do this that often. Mozilla has been harassing SeaMonkey users for a long time now.

Keeping profiles backed up, zipped, CSV and HTML exports, it’s not as “convenient” as sync, but it also doesn’t risk divulging your information.

Logging into a browser wasn’t even a thing until Chrome came along. Why do people do it? It can only hurt them.

Anyone who was born since the mid 90s has never known an America without the “USA PATRIOT ACT” or “REAL ID”.

It’s not their fault. They’ve never been Free, so how can they appreciate the concept?

They were not born into a Free and Democratic country like I was. They think this is normal. If they think this country is normal, why wouldn’t they think using Microsoft or Apple was normal, or DRM? When we saw the first spyware we said “Oh hell no!” and looked for something to destroy it. Today, it’s in your phone, your laptop, your devices at work.

During the COVID lockdowns, they even used this crisis to try to force more proprietary software on people. The State of Illinois demanded “Zoom” to attend court proceedings. It demanded “Microsoft Edge”, to edit a PDF. There were sites where I needed to apply for things that said “Don’t use your back button or a mobile browser or this could break.”

The State is running on really shoddy IT stuff, and how could it not?

It signed deals with a hodgepodge of crap software vendors like Microsoft and SalesForce, and it got progressively darker from there.

If you went to court and wouldn’t agree to use Zoom on your own computer, they tried sticking you in a room with it on one of their computers where it could see your face and hear your voice. That’s still not as bad as installing it on your computer, but it is bad.

The America where people were free was brutally murdered by Congress when *I* was 17, but it took some additional years to see just what they had done.

It’s doubtful that every country on Earth has betrayed and failed an entire generation or two of its citizens like America has.

Stallman, in the article, remembered when the US government actually exercised some authority over corporations, and how that’s pretty much gone now.

Even at Google’s anti-trust hearing, they’ve got the judge in their back pocket. They’re in there keeping the media out, keeping almost everything under seal, getting a bunch of witnesses they’ve essentially bribed, like Apple and Mozilla.

This is not a hearing that will lead to a fair outcome. It can’t.

Stallman also addressed Bill Gates and his infamous “Letter to Hobbyists”.

[KH] So what do you say, or what did you say to Bill Gates, when in his open letter to hobbyists back in 1976, he said “who can afford to do professional work for nothing?”

[RMS] Well, I never even saw that letter, I wasn’t using micro-computers, in fact I never did, and I wasn’t even aware of his existance at the time. But you’ll note that GNU stands for “GNU’s Not Unix” …

[KH] That’s right, what do you call that, it’s a recursive acronym

[RMS] Right, but this is, it’s not “GNU’s Not MS-DOS”, I wasn’t even thinking about MS-DOS which I considered a toy, and the Free Software Movement isn’t aimed at Microsoft, it’s only later that Microsoft developed almost a monoply and people started thinking of that as the thing that you might replace.

[KH] However the Bill Gates question remains valid, what hobbyist can put three man-years into programming, finding all bugs, documenting his product, and distributing it?

[RMS] Well actually, thousands of us do; because his argument is that Free Software couldn’t exist, and the fact is it does. He’s like somebody arguing that planes couldn’t possibly fly while you can go to the airport and see them taking off. There are tens of thousands of useful Free programs, some big, some small, that were worth packaging for users to conveniently install in free versions of GNU plus Linux operating systems. So, a better question would be; “why do people do this?”, but the fact is, we do, and I’ve seen many reasons for it. One is, politicial idealism like mine, but most people and most developers actually don’t share that. Another motive is “fun”, because hacking doesn’t just mean circumventing, it means playful cleverness, and solving problems, making a program work can be fun, it’s one example of hacking, which many of us enjoy.

When I was a child, I ran into the GNU GPL, I can’t recall whether it was the first or second version. It was on some program in a “disc of freeware and shareware”, which were the terms I thought of at that time.

I don’t recall seeing any source code with the program, so they actually might have just copied the binaries and the GPL, pointing out that they had just violated the GPL. 😛

However, at the time, I was a kid, right? What do kids not have a lot of? Money.

Well into the late 90s and early 2000s, I had Windows 98 and Linux on my nicest computer (which was not remarkable, but sufficient), but I was still buying a lot of DOS software and I was still using FreeDOS. All the stores were racing to dump as much DOS software as they could because Microsoft was getting rid of DOS.

I also kept using a lot of programs meant for Windows 3.1, and I had one computer that had to run MS-DOS because FreeDOS wouldn’t run Windows 3.11 in enhanced mode and I couldn’t get on the Internet without it.

So it was a mishmash of old software I got in the bargain bin (because when software came on physical media, capitalism did what it always does….overproduce), and old computers that the repair shop guy down the street didn’t want. My main system kept undergoing tear downs and upgrades.

Not because I’m one of those spoiled brats who had an unlimited budget for a computer, but rather because hardware became obsolete fast and I had the guy at the computer shop offering me deep discounts on anything I could stick on a Super Socket 7 motherboard.

So by the time I was done with the upgrades, it was hardly even the same computer that it started out as. It had 6 times more hard drive space, a processor more than twice as fast as it came with, 16 times as much RAM, and it ended up with a Voodoo 5 graphics card in the end. It kept it relevant into the 2000s.

I ended up doing a lot of those “Holy shit, they’re clearancing out processors and they only want $20 for this!”-type things over the years, even on Socket 754.

On the Super Socket 7 system’s lifespan, I ended up using a lot of “freeware” (including from Graham Pockett’s site where he had thousands of them), and a lot of Free and Open Source Software.

In the modern world, users fight just to “repair” their machines. Apple gave up fighting this in California after spending tens of millions of dollars in lobbying and open daylight bribery, using their customers’ money fighting against the interests of their customers.

They joined when they realized there was going to be some “right to repair” bill, and they could live with this one and continue cheating their customers with non-upgradeable hardware that is forced into being impossible to use due to being dropped from the Software Development Kit and eventually killed from the network after they add a couple more “g’s” that nobody even needs because phone network speeds have been fast enough for years.

Apple knows that you’re paying that Indian at Batteries Plus Bulbs the same price as you would the Apple Store if you need a battery upgrade, and if you go to him, your phone will say “non-genuine battery detected” and swell up like a balloon a few days later, and then he’s obviously used to chargebacks, so after he doesn’t agree to a refund, he’ll just try to defame you in rounds that go back and forth a few times before the credit card company forces the refund through.

So you get on the train and go to the Apple store because that’s what you do.

So Apple will still have the battery replacement market to themselves if you know what’s good for you and you don’t want to risk having the phone explode, and they know it, and that’s why it costs $79 now.

If just trying to keep something working is this bad, imagine trying to upgrade anything these days.

My Lenovo laptop, this laptop, has the RAM and SSD soldered into the board, everything is as non-upgradeable as they could possibly make it. They never planned that I would put Debian 12 on it instead of a bloated piggy like Windows 11, and then follow it up with ZRam to make it even less likely to run out of RAM than I was with 16 GB. But when the Left Ctrl key started to glitch out, I called and asked what it would cost. $250 for a damn keyboard. The whole laptop cost me like $900 3 years ago!

So I got into the KDE control panel and swapped the Super (Windows) key with Left Ctrl. Then I got used to it so I did it on my older laptop too.

It’s hard to even imagine the Super Socket 7 computer and how much more pleasant it was to upgrade than this modern shit. I E-Mailed HP and they told me all the jumper settings for every processor that I could use with the board. I got an E-Mail from one of the engineers, directly, within days. None of this modern crap where it’s some guy they stuck there in another country for 10 cents an hour to ask if you tried to reboot the computer. Soon to be a “chat bot” because a few stinking dollars a week so the guy can buy a plate of rice to eat after a 12 hour day is too much.

Over the life of the Super Socket 7 computer, I avoided buying another entire computer at least three times. One reason you can’t do this now is that Microsoft is losing money hand over fist and they know if you can flip the laptop over and yank the RAM and double it, or stick in a bigger SSD, or remove and replace the CPU, it means less duplicate sales of Windows, and their hardware vendors (Lenovo profits down 66% Year over Year) are even more motivated, so they’ll be able to sell anything at all. They HATE right-to-repair. Hate it!

Back to the Bill Gates Letter.

Bill Gates’s letter to hobbyists was laughable even 20-25 years ago. It didn’t age well at all, even into the BBS era, much less the Internet era, because even Windows users who had never heard of Linux could tell you that there were plenty of people making utilities and games and stuff.

Even if you only got binaries, and saying “Just keep it.” or “Send $5 if you think this is useful.” But you didn’t have to, to use the program.

So a lot of this wasn’t Free and Open Source, but it was free of charge, and then as time went on, more high quality Free and Open Source software came about and pretty soon it had displaced Windows entirely on my computers and I really wasn’t even that interested in Windows anymore.

And I’m still not. Windows 11 is so bad that if there’s anyone left at Microsoft who hasn’t been laid off yet, they should be incredibly ashamed of promoting a product this bad. It’s even worse than Windows Vista.

If I was even the slightest bit tempted to use Windows, one whiff of how slow, unstable, and full of crap and advertising it is would scare me right back off of it.

Not the least of which is because it has one of those “App Stores” that’s eventually designed to make it impossible to install software any other way so they and the government can control your computing entirely, and shakedown application developers for 30% of their licensing fees (or donations).

As time goes on, Windows is becoming less and less interesting, and much more menacing.

You almost never hear about it anymore other than the monthly problems with the latest version, the incessant malware, or the Free and Open Source Software they purloined to give it a feature that actually works, because they didn’t write it.

With Apple, Chrome OS, Linux, and Android, Windows almost feels like this bloated obsolescent turd that some stuffy old people and hillbillies use out of habit.

Even my ex, who I wouldn’t say is incredibly smart, told me he’s a Linux user now. He got a Steam Deck. He runs KDE on it. I mean, if he can figure it, out anyone can.

It’s always interesting to see the reviews on some <$200 Windows device and how it doesn’t even work and everyone hates it because with 4 GB RAM and a Celeron it does nothing at all, and you’re over here like “Let me put Linux and ZRam on it! I can make this useful! I see your System Monitor! The system service that makes sure Windows is not pirated is using 10% of your processor! LOL!”

Why do people tolerate proprietary software that’s not even good?

Well, I think a lot of people just act like it’s a burden that’s affordable to keep carrying as the costs mount.

Sometimes monetary, sometimes ones that are less obvious. win

Proprietary software in general is like Stephen King’s Needful Things.

You get it, it does a thing you wanted it to do, but there’s something horribly off about it, and you find out it’s cursed and it actually does something horrible that you never thought about. The devil is in there appealing to people’s vanity, selfishness, and short-term interests to push something that will hurt them.

When you use things such as Apple products, Windows, and proprietary software, eventually your computing becomes the State of Illinois in miniature.

A complete mess that barely works. It relies on a lot of hacks and workarounds. And if everyone knew it was like that, it would be better, but instead you have people bragging about what a great hunk of shit they bought.

Proprietary software is designed so that after you use it for a while, you can’t easily cut its tentacles because you’ve gotten hooked on doing everything a certain way that’s been provided, but doesn’t work anywhere else.

This is a huge problem with iPhones. They don’t even support RCS, so if you want to have advanced text messaging and video calls you have to agree on some non-Apple software that runs on iPhones and Android.

And people also engage in tribalism when they paint themselves into a corner. Like, I ran into this completely stupid “dating bingo card” where “Has an Android phone.” is a red flag.

Yeah, it’s a red flag that this guy is not a mindless spendthrift and isn’t going to tolerate it in a partner. Go find yourself someone else. Please.

Guys, you dodged a bullet!

I certainly don’t know about anyone else but with a landlord that comes out and raises the rent 10% every year, and medical bills, and food, and gas, etc., how are you even buying any of those crap. Debt?

I don’t have any of that right now either. Try savings. You’ll like it better.

But the biggest drag about proprietary software, DRM, advertising, etc. is the mindset it gets people into.

Behaviors that are inherently social and positive, like sharing, have a Russian Reversal pulled on them, and people are left saying how “only a criminal would share”.

Whenever I run into someone like this, I immediately stop talking to them. It’s a lost cause. And you see this behavior in younger people now, especially. It’s a tragedy.

I refuse to be trapped into doing something vital in a such a way that if anyone asks me for a copy of something, I have to say, “No. I agreed I would be an asshole to you and everyone else by agreeing to the license. And even if we wanted to disobey the license, I can’t because there is malware that makes sure I can’t give you a copy.”

Back when I was still a Windows user, I installed iTunes.

I didn’t care much about Free Software at this point, but Pepsi had free iTunes songs under every cap. So I installed it to try it out. At the time, a can of Pepsi was cheaper than a song on iTunes. I figured I’d buy one Pepsi and try the code. Out popped a song.

“Hmm, that’s weird. What the hell is an .m4p?”

It turned out that Apple was using this weird new format called AAC which was not an MP3 file. That alone wasn’t terribly important. They were both patent encumbered, they both played on the same devices, but what is “p”? These are supposed to have .m4a (MPEG-4 Audio) or .aac (Advanced Audio Coding) extensions.

Well, the “p” apparently stood for a euphemism for some Apple malware. Instead of calling Digital Restriction Malware what it is, they said it was “protected”. From me! The person who allegedly “purchased” it.

Well, that’s a neat trick.

I found this out when I went to play the file in Winamp and couldn’t. I didn’t know what DRM was at that point in my life, but when I found out what it was, I was so mad that I deleted the iTunes file, uninstalled iTunes, and told everyone I could talk to why they shouldn’t use iTunes.

Everything you spend money on that has a “Product Activator” or “DRM” makes you agree to be an asshole to everyone, binds you to that agreement, and then self-destructs. Thus, you wasted your money.

The “p” was for “pointless”. “Your mission, should you choose to accept it, is to fork over thousands of dollars to Apple. This file will self-destruct.”

Richard Stallman said that everything that has DRM that you do not know how to remove, you shouldn’t even touch it. I agree.

Did Stallman know about the DMCA? I can’t imagine he didn’t know that removing DRM is illegal.

Lots of things that are not wrong are illegal. Many laws do more harm than the activity that they outlaw, and laws that protect DRM are actively causing harm to society, and criminalizing people who are doing no wrong.

In this sense, we should reject all formats that control what you do after you spend the money. Now that all of the fools have subscribed to Apple Music or Spotify where they will own nothing despite eventually being out thousands of dollars, the price for an audio CD that I can buy and rip into lossless WavPack files is sometimes 7-8 for $5.

How stupid it would be for me to pay Apple or Spotify $15 a month (with the amusement tax that I am not amused by) and not own anything! Ever!

It will be a cold, cold day in Hell with Satan ice skating to work before I ever agree to give up real money in exchange for this.

In the time sense iTunes pissed me off, Apple and Microsoft have gone on to do far worse. If you stay for this, you’re not only hurting yourself. You’re hurting everybody.

I can deal with Microsoft Office formats, but creating them and distributing them is an evil, because it will mean that we’ve ceded control of something important to an evil company. Not just evil, incompetent. Their spreadsheet software has a seemingly unlimited number of bugs in it, so if you’re using it to any real extent, there’s almost certainly errors creeping in.

And these sorts of bugs in such an established product are almost impossible to fix, even if you want to, or knew how to.

In at least some cases, Microsoft has said they improved their math libraries, only to have that claim tested and to find out it was doing the same thing the previous version did!

Excel offers two RNGs, one in the ATP and another via a function call, RAND. In
versions prior to Excel 2003, both RNGs were unacceptably bad and Microsoft made no changes to the ATP RNG for Excel 2003,3 so we focus attention on the RNG for RAND.

Microsoft claims to have implemented the Wichmann–Hill RNG (Wichmann and Hill,
1982). However, the Wichmann–Hill RNG does not produce negative numbers. It has been reported in some newsgroups and in some press venues (e.g., PC Magazine,April 6, 2004, p.71) that, at default, when RAND should produce numbers on the interval(0, 1), it sometimes produces negative numbers and each of us has independently confirmed this phenomenon.


However, even if Microsoft had correctly implemented the Wichmann–Hill RNG, it would still be unacceptable.

On the accuracy of statistical procedures in Microsoft Excel 2003

Later on, in 2013, Microsoft’s Excel produced a report about the US federal deficit that made GDP growth in “high debt countries” look like it was about 22 times less than what it actually was during the time studied. The Republicans seized on this in demands to cut welfare programs.

The formula showed a range that produced a result saying countries with debt more than 90 percent of GDP yielded a negative growth rate of 0.1 percent. Adding the five countries excluded at the bottom of the Excel range, the rate would have been plus 2.2 percent.

How an Excel error derailed the federal deficit debate

Mind you, you have to pay quite a bit for Excel and Office, and now it’s on a “subscription” where you can’t ever stop paying or it won’t work.

All the while, a Free and Open Source Software program called Gnumeric was extremely accurate, and has found a niche in statistical analysis and scientific fields because they know you can’t trust Microsoft.

Proprietary software doesn’t just tend to be garbage with a coat of paint now and then, it is exploitative and tends to be full of bugs.

If RMS has made any mistake, it’s to only cut down proprietary software on terms related to user freedom. He should have also pushed much harder on why depending on it can backfire for other reasons.

Microsoft is like a landlord that goes in, and graciously rents you a dump, and doesn’t really fix anything, but extracts rent anyway. And you’re sort of grateful if he even comes out and unclogs a pipe now and then, and wonder how on Earth it can be this expensive for what you’re getting.

Their new subscription model will let them totally let the software rot. They don’t have to make it better or even look better. It is not on your computer, or if it is on your computer it’s a version called a “service”, which is another euphemism, which means that if you don’t pay this month you lose it this month, and you can no longer do things you could already do.

This is on top of agreeing to be an asshole to everyone on Earth, and have nothing to share, except maybe files of the format that got you into this mess.

Nothing is going to get better until we demand to make it better.

Much of the propaganda from the State these days is palpable.

I mentioned to Roy today that the UK police put up a “notice to parents” that said if your children are using “Linux”, “virtual machines”, or “Tor”, contact the police for an intervention!

Yes, because who doesn’t love INVITING the police over. I mean, they’re British so they can have tea with the cops while they stick their big fat cop noses all over the house and then have a little talk with Johnny or Timmy about how Virtual Machines with Linux are the devil’s lettuce or something. I don’t know.

I would say I smell Microsoft, but truth be told, Microsoft is just the enforcement of a State that doesn’t want the public using encrypion.

In former democracies turned autocratic kleptocracy, such as the United States, there’s a huge push to just make most uses of encryption illegal if the government has a hard time breaking them. They promote this huge lie that only criminals want privacy.

If they get their way, the only encryption you’ll be allowed to use is to talk to your bank and maybe some DRM software that is hurting you, and that’s about it. It is no sort of future we should want or allow to happen.

It’s much easier to attack people who use software like Windows or Mac, because if you don’t control the operating system, you’ve lost already. Stop here. They want this layer of spyware underneath you using their other euphemism. “Security”.

Yes, the “security” of having a scanner that sends Microsoft all your keystrokes and hash values of everything that hits your hard disk.

(For “security”, you know. How can you possibly be secure without telling an ICE/DHS contractor with backdoors in their products everything?)

I’ve been using Linux more than 25 years now and have never had a virus. I’ve uploaded Windows programs to VirusTotal or scanned them with ClamAV and found viruses in them and deleted them before running them in Wine, but out of the box, Wine isn’t even there. It’s optional. And most malware doesn’t really do what it was designed for in Wine anyway because it’s not Windows. So like, it goes to infect a Windows system service or something, and that service isn’t really there because it’s not Windows.

Still can’t hurt to check. But the thing is, I decide whether I upload something to VirusTotal. ClamAV uses a local database. I’m not telling anyone anything about anything else.

In summary, modern computing is worse in nearly every way.

We have to fight like Hell to avoid being spied on, to fix our own property, and to run the software we really want.

We’re in court and at the ballot box and fighting against companies like Apple which use our own money against us, just for watered down versions of rights that everyone took for granted 20 years ago.

It must stop. Even if it means abandoning the PC and accepting whatever limitations that more open platforms bring, practically, in the short term.

Malware in the Ubuntu Snap Store Again.

Malware in the Ubuntu Snap Store Again.

I keep telling people not to use Snaps.

This isn’t even the first time, or the second, or third, that confirmed malware has been found in the Snap store.

Snaps have a lot of problems, including being an undocumented and proprietary store format which only Canonical can operate. That means that the software is totally useless if their store ever goes down or they get tired of running it.

They don’t, as a rule, inspect anything that actually goes in there, so the place is ripe for abuse.

Naturally, Microsoft pushes Snaps if you want to run any Microsoft software. They have a partnership with Canonical, which is another reason to avoid Ubuntu and Snaps.

Snaps aren’t even really universal. Forget other distributions, I have found some that wouldn’t work on Ubuntu if you had KDE. A package that needs Ubuntu, and GNOME on Ubuntu, is not a universal package. Yet, GZDoom was like this.

The Flatpak of GZDoom has ran everywhere I’ve installed it.

It’s amusing that Linux distributions never had a malware problem to speak of until Canonical came along and did Snap, and now that they did, and partnered with Microsoft to promote it, Microsoft-affiliated media declares that Linux has a malware problem.

I don’t have Snap and I will never install it on Debian, because it’s a nasty and malicious attack on the users, repeated malware incidents aside.

Alan Pope put up an article about why Linux *needs* app stores. Debian has an extensive software collection and I put Synaptic Package Manager in so I could see it all without this ridiculous “AppStream” nonsense in Plasma Discover.

There are more packages in every distribution than there will ever be AppStream data for.

I almost always find the software I need in Apt. I have several Flatpaks installed for games and stuff, but not stuff that I can get packaged properly in Debian format.

Debian can’t review external stores that are not part of Debian, which is why Flatpak is optionally there, but not by default. It’s impossible to secure Flatpak because of the “library soup” it throws everywhere which is why I’m keen to keep the number of Flatpaks installed down to a minimum. But Snap is completely unacceptable.

Canonical’s major contribution to Linux appears to be working with Microsoft to import Windows-style security disasters into Ubuntu.

There is essentially no value in app stores. To borrow a Richard Stallman line for a minute, the idea is beyond stupid, it’s a marketing campaign. And as with most marketing campaigns, the hype is there to make people think the outcome is inevitable and that there’s no choice.

I recently came across a Wikipedia article about an app store that was so poorly written that I proposed the entire article for deletion. It turned out that nobody objected and the entire article came down as soon as the Proposed Deletion tag aged to the required time.

How many people came across the article? Well, it was about an app store on an OS from the 90s, but it rubbed me the wrong way even having it there. It was written in such a way as to make DRM sound like a feature and there are certainly enough articles on Wikipedia, that you can’t fix because marketing companies watch them closely, but this one wasn’t being monitored like that because it was about NeXTStep’s app store, and a lot of sycophantic lines about Steve Jobs.

Well, it’s gone now, and it’s likely not coming back.

Recently, someone registered a Wikipedia account simply to follow me around and vandalize my edits. That’s the only thing they’ve done in the past three days.

Wikipedia is almost, a lost cause. It’s more like social networks, pointless. Everything is lost, but nothing there was important to begin with. The Codes of Censorship drive away anyone interesting.

Sometimes they go and set up their own server where they don’t moderate anything as long as it’s not illegal, and that’s at least better than your garden variety “community”.

Amusingly, Matthew Garrett, recently seems to have lost his own hosting on a Mastodon server.

It seems that the “President of GNOME” (LOL), who gave him this platform, either can’t figure out how to, or can’t be bothered, to recover it.

It’s certainly plausible that nobody made backups and it’s just lost.

Every “social network”, big or small, will end up this way eventually. This one only had three accounts on it, but even Facebook will be gone someday. It’s better to stop participating.

It’s been years now since I’ve even been on it and I am still getting checks in the mail over illegal things that Facebook did while I had an account.

“They” (the cancel mob) that tends to hang out in Mastodon space didn’t even have to bully Garrett like they did to get rid of me. He just got foiled, it seems, by incompetent server administration.

Like most walled gardens, Mastodon has no way for the user to pack up years worth of posts and unpack them someplace else. At some point you lose everything whether they actually cancel you or just get tired of it, or something crashes and they weren’t making proper backups. It’s a waste of time and it leaves you feeling defeated. So the better choice is to only have a presence where people can’t easily harm you.

Richard Stallman announced that he has cancer, but that it is treatable and that he should live longer.

Just days before Matthew Garrett’s microblog went down, he was saying he wished “there was a replacement” waiting for Stallman.

I read that and thought it was in bad taste, to say the lease.

I’m glad that RMS is still alive and some of the people who appear to maybe fantasize about ill wishes for him are finding themselves less relevant, sometimes by “outages” or even Libera Chat dying at the pace of a light dimmer. Just, less people on the network every month until it becomes a complete ghost town.

If Richard Stallman were to be replaced, or canceled, (people have tried before, with vicious lies) he’d almost certainly be replaced with someone who would always tow the line for enemies of Free Software.

With any luck, Stallman will be around for a long time to come. I wish him a speedy recovery.

Going back to the issue of Linux distributions for a moment, it is bad enough that we have a rat infestation, of people who claim to be friends, but actually implement malware intended to make my computer disobey me or not be able to easily be told to do what I want it to do (remove Windows, install this OS over here, don’t “validate” anything with Microsoft certificates, whatever I say to do is right).

That’s where we turn around and talk about “apps” again. The “app stores” are basically, containerized programs. They do nasty things that force the user to keep their hands out of the container. What kind of a future is it when you can’t even get in the container and meaningfully change the way even Free Software will work?

Stores like Snap and Flatpak are an open sewer designed to hide how things work from you and foist proprietary software. Proprietary software vendors would probably really appreciate the container preventing the user from messing around with the program too much. You toss in a payments system later and you do have an “app store”.

Here you go. Don’t touch this. You’re not allowed!

There is perhaps no greater regression than a computer so locked down from boot to running a program than what Microsoft, IBM, and Canonical are dumping on Linux, which is why I have Debian now and don’t touch Flatpak for anything terribly important.

If Flatpak became unavailable on Debian, it wouldn’t be a disaster for me. I’d have to live with an older version of some emulators or build or backport them myself. Big whoop.

Operating systems that rely on Flatpak are a pointless idea. You’re turning yourself into a clone of something that already exists. Fedora Silverblue.

Please don’t do this!

I see that Arch Linux is getting ready to offer Unity, the desktop Ubuntu abandoned.

I suppose there’s no harm in having this as an option. During the various ways that Canonical previously tried to monetize the desktop, they turned Ubuntu into keylogging malware that sent your keystrokes to an Amazon server through the Unity HUD, but obviously that plug-in is no longer in Unity, and Unity (the community continuation) is under the GPLv3, and obviously nobody maintaining it now is signing the Canonical copyright assignment for new code, so it’s gotten too far away from Canonical trying to claw back if they wanted it.

I myself might eventually pop in and see what they manage to do with it now that it is not hazardous waste pushed by Canonical.

Canonical’s defense the entire time the Amazon Lens was there was basically what Firefox’s is now for their keylogging adware. You can turn it off, if you figure out how.

Unfortunately, continued use of a product that has already done something like this just shows them how many people tolerated it and makes them wonder what they can get away with next.

GTK Applications Are Largely Irrelevant.

Roy mentioned that GTK is a lot worse now than it used to be.

Since I switched to KDE and stopped hitting myself over the head with all of that GNOME stupidity which made using my PC very unpleasant, I’ve identified maybe a few applications that make any substantial usage of GNOME that I actually still have.

You should probably just remove as many as you can, honestly.

The attitude of GTK “developers” is very user-hostile.

Consider “Stop Theming My App” where users are basically threatened that unless the themes for GTK stop, there might be “technical measures” put into place to stop you.

Like, what the Hell even is this shit? It’s my computer. Go away.

The user is ALWAYS right.

Even when the user is wrong, they are still right.

Any THING the user wants to do with THEIR OWN COMPUTER is right.

We already have a word for an operating system where the theming system is “protected” from the user making “unauthorized” changes to it. (Unless they HACK the dll.)

It’s called Windows.

It has two “modes”. “Light” and “Dark”, like GNOME does.

And “Dark” is one more option than they had before.

KDE has all kinds of themes.

You want to install an ugly pink one with ponies everywhere and “What in God’s name is that font?”, you can. Knock yourself out.

Themes are a work of art. The user stares at the monitor, sometimes for hours a day, and they deserve to have something that doesn’t look like garbage. Adwaita is a very boring theme that gets old fast. It does not look good at all.

It’s more of this “Let’s make GNOME look like a stupid Mac and shove our branding in your face.” mentality, than an actual theme.

Some of the KDE themes, look rather nice. You can make KDE look like anything because there’s no Hitlerian control freaks creating a Web site that probably nobody but me even knew about, yelling at users for applying a theme. And lying about how the “concept has always been broken”.

That’s what it is, a lie.

Themes worked FINE in GNOME 2, the last good series of GNOME.

I had Nimbus and Nimbus-Dark, from Solaris, not this pale gray nonsense called “Adwaita” that looks very “Oh that’s a nice shade of gray. I think I’ll go get some mayo on white bread and watch C-SPAN.”

The only way to deal with these arrogant GNOME and GTK “developers” as a user is switch to KDE or LxQt or something and get rid of as many GTK applications as you can.

KDE and Qt have an extensive list of good applications, or at least KDE and Qt bindings to programs you must have like LibreOffice, or Breeze-GTK to make Firefox and SeaMonkey look good.

The more GTK applications you get rid of, the less they control you.

They can’t control a toolkit they don’t develop.

Apple Re-Releasing the Same Products Every Year.

Apple Re-Releasing the Same Products Every Year.

Even some Apple users are beginning to catch on to the fact that Apple doesn’t innovate.

Every year for several years, there’s been almost no changes to the iPhone, and Apple unveils another one with an incremented number as if they were making a major release. The thing is basically a “done product” where there are no real features to add.

The first rule of Capitalism is to make a spectacle out of everything, no matter how trivial, as if it’s a product they’ll wonder how they’ve ever lived without.

Apple has it down to, almost a science. To keep sales moving, they run spectacles where they unveil a new phone as if Jesus Christ came down from the Heavens.

This year, many people finally noticed when the only real difference in the iPhone 15 was about an ounce of weight and a very slightly better camera.

Naturally, people paying extra so they can trade in their iPhone every year have been had, and some of them are starting to realize it. Especially in this era of high inflation and lots of layoff and reduced work hours.

They throw away valuable Capital, that cost them hours of work, every month, only so they can get a very marginally better product.

Since “There’s no such thing as a free lunch.”, it’s better, fiscally, to own the phone until the carrier throws you off because the modem is too old. If the battery dies, replace the battery. This is like most goods.

Apple fought right-to-repair, tooth and nail, with the same money people (over)paid them for their products.

I usually wear a pair of shoes for several years. If they get uncomfortable, I replace the insoles for $10. If the laces shred or break, I buy new laces for a few dollars.

Over that ~6 years I wear the same pair of shoes, I spend maybe $13 servicing them vs. $180 replacing them a couple of times. If they get dirty, wash them. There’s a concept.

We don’t make a ton of money, but due to not making lots and lots of unnecessary purchases, we are seldom faced with a situation where something that is actually important comes up and are pressured to go into lots of debt to handle it, so we can have the “iPhone for Life” plan.

Recently, one of my cats had major surgery to remove some tumors. I value my cat more than having some damned stupid iPhone, obviously. She is family, a phone is a lifeless object and a constant annoyance. The one I have is usually turned off so that people can’t bother me with it while I live my life. If it’s important, I’ll return their voicemail.

When the vet told me the bill would be $834, I said, “Well, that’s bad, but not a disaster.”, then she went into some speech about “Care Credit”, a medical credit card they throw at people in America who can’t afford to pay a dental bill or to help their sick pet. 27% compounding interest. You’ll never be able to pay it back. But since we had savings, I put it on a rewards credit card, and got $40 in points, and then I will pay it back immediately.

Apple products are good at crowding out your money, and the important things you could use said money for, so you can go into debt somewhere else down the road, and be pressured to do more work to earn more money than it would cost, if you had money instead of the Apple products.

Android phones continue to have new applications for years after the system updates stop. You may, at least, continue using it for as long as it physically works, with new Web browsers and such.

iPhones just pop up a message saying there’s no new apps and even the ones you already have are no longer allowed to run. It happened to my mother with her old iPhone and I laughed because there were people running Android Gingerbread for so long that it turned into the Windows XP of Android.

You just don’t get a lot for your money with Apple devices, which is no great secret, but increasingly they foist these “barely even an upgrade” devices on you, not by merit, but by dirty tricks.

Mac OS works like this too.

There is a hard cut off date, where Apple forces Mac OS to stop being allowed to upgrade over the last one on your existing computer, even though nothing about the OS has changed to make it incompatible.

Of course, the cynical (but realistic) take is that there’s a business strategy behind dropping software support for older devices. If Apple cuts off macOS support for your Mac, you’re much more likely to consider buying a new one than you would if you could enjoy the latest features and changes. This is definitely starting to change, as more and more people realize that their old tech is still good enough to hold onto, but that won’t help you if your Mac is already unsupported.

=Lifehacker

There is a project to trick later versions of Mac OS to run on unsupported Macs, which is actually important since Apple very quickly drops support for building new software for old releases, so that developers can’t even support you if they wanted to.

The compatibility matrix shows that you can run new Mac OS versions on surprisingly old hardware. Eventually, something important will not work quite right, but it’s better than having no support at all, and your browser complaining that it’s 48 releases behind, like what happened to my spouse’s 2008 Macbook.

By tricking it into installing a newer version of Mac OS, I was able to bring Chrome up to the then-current version until like 2021 when they finally released a version of the OS that was incompatible with the laptop.

But they cut off the laptop from OS upgrades, officially, in 2014, so another 7 years is how long it should have lasted, and the only reason to do this is to force e-waste into the landfills so that people are back in the Apple store buying new junk.

Many Apple users buy these things because they’re just not very handy with computers. By having so many obsolete versions with the browser screaming that it hasn’t had an update in years, which users like my spouse just keep clicking OK on and browsing with anyway, Apple is setting up its customers for a huge security disaster.

I also bought him a $129 Chromebook with 4 GB of RAM and a Celeron that ran rings around the Macbook, so as far as a replacement computer, we did NOT need another $2,000 Apple product that isn’t even going to be around 6 years later.

Chrome OS is not the OS I would have preferred, but my spouse is not a computer expert and the options were essentially trying to answer everything in that big brain of mine about Linux, dumping Windows on him and getting to deal with it whenever Microsoft ruined it with a broken update or he installed malware and brought it to me, unload thousands of dollars on another Mac so Apple could pull this shit again, or give him a Chromebook and sort of let him figure out Linux applications in a controlled environment.

At the very least, I was able to get him a serviceable and cost-effective computer that doesn’t put his security in danger.

It’s dangerous to run a currently-supported OS with a current Web browser, especially if you don’t do what I do and neuter Web sites with uBlock-Origin and NoScript and lots of custom settings to take away things like WASM, WebRTC, and WebGL. The more junk you don’t use that you can take away from the Web, the less of a weapons depot random potentially malicious Web sites have to hurt you with.

Apple products don’t get repeat business due to excellent advancements in computing, they get lots of repeat business because they’re not ruggedly built, they cut off software to prod you, and they bloat things up.

They’re not better than Microsoft. Just bad in somewhat different ways.

Commodity Fetishism. Wearing the Air Jordans to the Revolutionary Communist Meeting. AI for Vietnam, Says “Weekend at Bernie’s” Biden.

More car thoughts about economics.

As America falls over and stores complain about how much they lose to theft, I have some more musings on what’s going on with Capitalism in America.

Capitalism, makes bad products, ones that even violate the minimum safety regulations that theoretically exist in America, and nobody does anything about it.

About 10 years ago, I was broke, and I was looking for ways to save money on almost anything I could. When I went to the Dollar Tree, where everything really was $1, I bought some bags of coffee.

They said, “Product of Vietnam”, but they were $1. So I bought several bags and figured I was done buying coffee for the month.

When I got home, and brewed a pot, it left a plastic-like residue all over my coffee maker carafe, and I had to chisel it apart with a butter knife before I could use the coffee maker again.

I have no idea what that stuff was, but needless to say I did not drink the coffee.

I’ve bought a couple other products there before I realized completely what Dollar Tree actually was. It’s not a way to be frugal, it’s a false economy.

They aim for low prices, because so many people in America can’t afford anything better, and it does not matter at all if any of the products are “good”, at least on some level.

When I read that Dollar Tree is complaining about rampant theft, I became quite concerned about the current situation in America and what it means for the future.

Previously, for an item to be considered worthy of theft, it had to appeal to people who would see it as sort of a “religious artifact”, yet didn’t have the money that a Capitalist economy demands for such a thing.

Consider the $300-600 Air Jordan shoes, and how there are so many ways people get them. From smash-and-grab retail theft, to working a lot to buy just one pair of shoes, which cost 10-20 times what a perfectly good unbranded pair of shoes cost, to even using rent-to-own, and paying $1,200 for the shoes, eventually.

Marx gave us the concept of “Commodity Fetishism”.

It’s when an object loses its appeal over its utilitarian value to the consumer, and takes on, sort of a life of its own, being given an, almost mystical or mythological qualities in the person’s mind.

Consider Apple products. They have very little utilitarian value. If you want a set of earbuds, you can get something as good as AirPods for no more than $40, yet Apple charges up to, I think $300 for a codec with a battery and a little plastic.

This is commodity fetishism. People are encouraged through advertising, to pay for their own brainwashing, and a premium for an otherwise limited-value proposition.

People who fall victim to fetishism of commodities will end up paying too much for everything from coffee to computers.

While there is definitely a point where things get too cheap to possibly be good in a Capitalist economy ($1 coffee or $1 3.5 oz frozen ribeye steaks at the dollar store), there’s also a point where you get a good product, but you’re paying 10 times as much as you should, because there was a point where the utilitarian value of the purchase leveled off, and it was a long time ago.

So now you’re in debt to the “credit card” people and the “finance company”, and reality sets in that the product did not raise your standard of living, but you are paying for them fooling you.

Commodity fetishism leads to high levels of debt and dissatisfaction.

When people say that nobody in America is poor because they all have flat screens and nice shoes, that’s what this means.

You have no….money, per se, but Capitalism has made you rich in flat screen TVs, BMW cars, Apple phones, AirPods, Air Jordans, and Kirby vacuums…

(I know, you just opened the door and before you knew it, the guy had you signing papers, and you don’t even have any carpet!)

If a product is actually so much better that it earns its high price, then this isn’t automatically commodity fetishism, but this is a rarity.

“A religion may be discerned in capitalism – that is to say, capitalism serves essentially to allay the same anxieties, torments, and disturbances to which the so-called religions offered answers.”

“Capitalism is probably the first instance of a cult that creates guilt, not atonement.”

– Walter Benjamin, Capitalism as Religion

Most people born in America engage in Commodity Fetishism.

It’s almost inevitable thanks to the cradle to grave brainwashing that you’re only one product away from happiness.

Hell, I don’t know ONE person who isn’t affected by this lunacy, except me, and I must confess there have been times. But it seems everyone else I know has it so much worse.

70 hour work weeks and the whole Amazon warehouse in their closet. They don’t even open the boxes anymore. It’s rather disgusting.

But human nature is to be greedy, and advertisers like this.

Even in the Soviet Union, where you could get into huge trouble for having an underground dance club with Western music, booze, cigarettes, and clothing, they happened and the government was never successful in shutting them down although some did get raided.

One of the latest, and weirdest, phenomenons of Capitalism is their belief that they can eventually replace most workers with “AI”.

The third world…the third world….the southern hemisphere!

The third world…..the third world….the southern hemisphere……A
stop job is running 1m 30s….

The computer is rebooting NOW….Reason: User pressed Ctrl-Alt-Del 5
times…..hangs.

*sigh* *Holds in the power button.*

-Joe Biden’s Brain and Karen Jean-Pierre

When Bonehead Biden was in Vietnam the other day, where his brain took another dump on him mid-sentence and he started saying “The third world, the third world, the southern hemisphere.” followed by a word salad and Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre quickly rushing the demented old coot off the stage, it was said that the United States will have Microsoft “export AI” to Vietnam.

One does wonder what a “Communist worker’s state” will do with “Microsoft AI”, which has lost its novelty, and which people here don’t really use much anymore.

As soon as people got tired of ELIZA on Steroids, they started leaving “ChatGPT” alone.

The barely noticeable uptick in Bing market share quickly evaporated.

Again, what are Communists going to do with a chat bot?

Anyone? Anyone? Bueller? Bueller?

The closest thing we have to a Communist Party in America is something called “RevCom” for Revolutionary Communism.

I only became aware of it while I was in South Chicago for a while.

I don’t think any of them have been brushing up on Marx. It’s a bit, uhm, dry reading, and the people calling themselves Revolutionary Communists don’t strike me as big readers who know a lot of five dollar words.

I’ve never encountered, actual Communists, in America.

The label is so toxic that the only people using it officially are derelicts who have nothing and are pissed.

Even people who are basically Communists here swear up and down that they’re not.

They’re Democrats, or Socialists, or Democratic Socialists, or they make up new words.

Anything but Communism.

What does amaze me is how a country that takes away everything from people and leaves them homeless or dying from lack of food or medical care, has been so good about suppressing revolt.

The United States has been unbelievably more successful with violently suppressing dissent than the Soviet Union was.

There came a point where so many people in the Soviet Union were so dissatisfied with it that it broke apart, and instead of murdering EVERYONE eventually the powers that be let it go.

That rather says a lot about America, I think.

We have long since crossed the point where people would replace it with something else if they possibly could. If they had the power to change things.

Except that our government always credibly threatens “the most vicious dogs” and “when the looting starts, the shooting starts” (two of Trump’s best), and people just quietly go back inside their home (or tent) and quit “causing trouble”, again.

There’s something different that’s happening this time, though. More people are just going into the stores and taking things and they don’t even care if the police are watching them. They have no job, despite the fake government statistics saying everyone is flush with cash, well fed, and gainfully employed.

Communist governments would be too ashamed to produce statistics such as the ones that the Bureau of Labor Statistics has gotten away with.

When Trump had them make a “math error” to not count a million unemployed people, Barack Obama stepped in and claimed nobody at BLS would ever lie to us. Oh sure, right.

(The same BLS that says the dollar has only lost two-thirds of its value since I was born in 1984, through 2023, when I’ve seen it lose at least that much as it pertains to rent and food since 2003.)

They’re all swamp monsters. Trump was just one that didn’t get along with the rest.

Everyone who has been paying attention to this country knows that this is not a happy crew and that our current president is basically full-on Weekend at Bernie’s because his mind is so gone. Turns out, we don’t even need a president, because they can put documents in front of a confused old man and have him sign ’em.

Maybe that’s how they got him to say Microsoft will export AI to Vietnam.

One of the only things that a lot of Communist governments did get right was basing a national operating system on GNU/Linux.

This isn’t actually just about Communism trying to provide affordable technology for its citizens. It’s a national security issue. Windows is horribly architected and impossible to secure. It’s also got built-in spyware for the US government.

You would have to be retarded to rely on something like this from an enemy country that wants to keep tabs on you.

It’s not just Communists that are ripping Windows and other US tech out of their computing, and a lot of it is because Microsoft is also an economic drain on their country’s economy. But that’s not even the main concern.

I just fail to see how wasting money on some Microsoft chat bot is going to help them when their government throws Windows out because it doesn’t want to be the victim of espionage.

Maybe they just don’t actually plan to use it for anything but had to do something to get the corrupt Bernie Lomax Biden Administration to open talks with Vietnam.

The Death of Comedy, Corporations Offer Jobs to Silence Critics and Shut Down Opposition, and “Power Tool Product Activation”.

Corporations Offer People Jobs to Silence Critics and Shut Down the Opposition.

The other day, I heard a commercial on the radio where Jim Gaffigan was shilling Walmart’s prepaid cell phones, “Straight Talk”.

Even good comedians, like George Carlin, ended up doing advertising. Carlin didn’t apologize for it, nor should he have.

Doing a few commercials for a phone company trying to get people to take their collect call business there wasn’t particularly unethical, and nobody was trying to cancel him or his message.

(Besides, everyone knew how to use collect calls for free. You just hurried up and said the pay phone’s public phone number when it asked for your name and hung up after the other party declined the call. Then they knew which pay phone to call.)

Everyone knew that George Carlin, was a fairly crass comedian, he pissed some people off, but it was the 80s, 90s, 2000s.

So you had comedians like Sam Kinison, George Carlin, and Bill Hicks, and when they pissed people off, nobody cared.

It wasn’t career-ending, and most people just weren’t even pissed off, they shrugged and went about their way, like grown ups used to do before everyone suddenly got so soft.

Even when Gilbert Gottfried had a gaffe, he went to New York City right after 9/11 and said he would have flown, but they wanted to make a quick stop at the Chrysler Building, people shouted “Too soon, man!”, but they took it in stride. New Yorkers used to be tough.

Even though Gottfried would have never worked with material like he had in the 90s, were he to start today, Disney put him in movies. He was the parrot in Aladdin, alongside Robin Williams, who also had “interesting” material.

Jim Gaffigan is one of these “new” comedians. Not that funny.

Not his fault, honestly.

Society has become so thin-skinned that if you tell the wrong joke, you’ll never work again, so “comedy” is very sanitized now, and there’s really nothing out there that will make you fall out of your chair laughing.

Most of the “fall out of your chair laughing” jokes are raunchy, socially inappropriate, a lampoon of someone that is now considered “marginalized” and “needing other people to feel offended for them”.

As a gay man, I say that Married With Children was one of my favorite shows. Still is. It’s held up pretty well.

Al, the every man. Al, with “the Dodge with no upholstery, no gas, and six more payments”. Al where, “I can always have more kids, but we all know that’s the only car I’ll ever be able to afford.”

Al whose life went wrong because he “kept washing out and reusing a condom” which finally broke, causing him to get Peggy pregnant while they were in high school.

Mind you, this was on TV, not even “premium” cable, at a time when the Moral Majority was everywhere and Ronald Reagan was in the White House!

Also mind you, the United States CDC posted to “Twitter” just in 2019, I believe, that “We say it because people do it. Don’t put your condoms in the dishwasher.”

Al Bundy was conveying an important public health message almost 40 years before the CDC would openly talk about condoms.

When Married With Children “finally went too far”, it was the episode where Al and Steve went to a sex shop, and there were some jokes about transvestites and gay men, and I found them absolutely hysterical.

My parents didn’t even care if I watched this show when I was 7-8 years old, you know.

What makes Married With Children so funny is that it was a spoof of the Cosby Show. Where the Cosby Show was wholesome, and Bill Cosby was presented to people as the Moral Majority’s “TV Dad”, Al Bundy was dysfunction as all hell, not that bright, salty, and absolutely not a role model.

Later, we’d find out that Bill Cosby was putting roofies in women’s drinks and raping them while they were unconscious.

It’s always the people who are “too clean” that end up having the most dirty laundry, isn’t it? Bill liked pudding, in the commercials.

Bill Cosby was doing Jell-O and Jell-O “puddin'” commercials.

In real life, Bill liked pudding, pudding his dick where it didn’t belong.

In a statement about how sick the real world actually is, his convictions were overturned by a court and he’ll die a free man while people worry about what jokes a comedian might tell.

The truly great comedians are all gone.

You start saying shit like this, you lose advertisers, you get canceled shows in Vegas (Carlin was in Vegas a lot), and you just “don’t work again”.

So comedy has gotten rather un-funny thanks to “Social Justice Warriors”.

Nobody asked me, as a gay man, if I thought Al’s trip to the sex shop was funny or not. I thought it was hysterical. It wasn’t like, some vicious anti-gay assault. But it wouldn’t have flown today.

Why? Well, we have too many people like “Brandon Lobsta” (as we call him on Techrights, one of the trolls that harasses us…) claiming you can sue people for being impolite.

Anyway, “Brandon Lobsta” and the rest of the modern “Left”, are like that stupid lady in Michigan who complained about “Al Bundy” to the FCC, but even back then, the network just went to the producers and said “tone it down, just a little, okay?” and they went on to make fun of “some lady in Michigan” on a future episode.

But Jim Gaffigan, the closest he got to funny, the thing that made him notable at all, was the Hot Pockets routine.

You can’t roast people, but you can call garbage Nestle “food” products, “Diarrhea Pockets” and go into all sorts of vitriol about how much you hate the barbecue beef.

I read that after he started this routine, Nestle tried to hire him to do Hot Pockets commercials.

Control the opposition. “If we hire him, he’ll stop telling people how bad Hot Pockets are. His routine is bad for the brand. Hiring him will be cheap.”

It reminded me of when Apple tried to hire Linus Torvalds in 2000.

Steve Jobs said they’d give him a lot of money and an important title at Apple, and he’d work on “the UNIX with the largest user base”.

He refused. Linux is the “*nix” with the largest user base now. Across the widest variety of computers. Mac OS is falling apart and many of the people who attempted to use it as UNIX even admit it and switch to Linux.

The stipulation to take the job at Apple was he’d have to quit working on Linux forever.

Steve Jobs realized, years ahead of Android (Linux powers their iPhone competitor and has stopped Apple from gaining the other 86% of the global phone market), that Linux would be a problem for Apple someday and they should nip it in the bud.

It would have been cheap, and it would have been brilliant (for Apple), if he took the bait, and the appeals to ego.

Hell, the Mac might actually be a more serious operating system today if it had an actual kernel programmer that knew what he was doing working at Apple.

The time period also was around the point that Steve Jobs tried to convince Richard Stallman to allow Apple to violate the GNU GPL and create a proprietary Objective-C compiler for GCC. When Stallman refused and told him the FSF would take action, we got a Free Software compiler for Objective-C.

Later, Apple replaced GCC with a different compiler platform that does not generate very good compiled code, but it is under a license that allows proprietary compiler front-ends.

The threat of “controlling the opposition” and keeping things “corporate friendly”, with stuff that seems innocent enough, like “Codes of Conduct” will always be out there.

The powers that be have already done enormous damage this way. Being aware of the problems can help us avoid more.

Apple didn’t manage to kill Linux or GCC, but they tried, through sabotage and appeals to vanity and ego.

Clang has done enormous damage to the goal of having Free Software compiler tools.

Mozilla even defamed the GNU Project, lied and said Clang produced better binaries, and then sabotaged the build environment for Firefox if you use GCC.

(They don’t update the build system for that and so it’s basically lost its optimization options that way.)

While we’re dealing with all of these “Leftist Karens” who get mad about comedy, we face bigger issues. Real issues.

Today, I was listening to NPR while I was bored. They tipped me off to something Home Depot and Lowes are going to do.

They’re going to sell power tools that don’t work if you don’t buy them.

They have “bluetooth” something-or-other, and of course it’s the future so “blockchain blockchain!”, and next it’ll be “AI!”.

Maybe they can bring Microsoft in and create DeWalt 365 or something, where you have to subscribe to your power saw and if you don’t pay them $6.99 a month forever after you buy it, you can’t work.

Also, no work for days when Azure crashes.

It can be just like Microsoft Office.

Sure it could start out as an anti-shoplifting measure, then you’ll have to pay a fee every month to keep using tools you own.

Crazy? Hardly. My mechanic couldn’t do an alignment on my car several months ago because the activation server for the computer that runs the machine from Snap-On wouldn’t respond.

When they called the vendor, Snap-On says “Oh we don’t support Windows XP anymore. So you’ll need a new machine running Windows 11, and we’re going to bill you for all the hardware on the rack, because it won’t work with the new computer. Also, it’s a monthly subscription now.

Their attitude is, you need it to work. What are you going to do about it?

Like Microsoft.

The CEO of Home Depot says that the change is supposed to be less visible than putting the power tools behind locked cases or something. That they don’t want to “Look like an armed encampment” to the customers there to pickup their “hammers and nails”.

The CEOs of the major hardware chains tend to be a bunch of MAGA people, really awful people. You know. “Spike the homeless, cut food stamps, kill Social Security! What? They’re stealing power tools? PRODUCT ACTIVATORS!”

Perhaps, eventually, they can be like Walmart, cutting my spouse’s hours while they pay off duty police officers to stand there and not do anything about the arsonists and looters, but they have plenty of time for writing my license plate in their little clipbook for parking in a yellow zone (not a fire zone, not a handy crapped spot) for 2 minutes.

When I go there to pick him up now, I just circle the parking lot following the arrows, at idle speed. Instead of getting out of the way, I can just let my car loop around a few times real slow until he comes out.

I’m really glad to know they’re paying these people $25 an hour to mind where I idle for a couple minutes, but the CEOs still scream of “shrink”.