Matthew Garrett, Says San Francisco People “Get it.” With the City in Court Attacking Homeless Americans. Also Blasts US Constitution.
Matthew Garrett told me the other day on TechRights IRC that it’s unfortunate that American citizens can’t be arrested for talking about things he doesn’t agree with.
He also keeps saying that there shouldn’t be a right to own guns.
Well, in both cases we have the right to speech and the right to own guns.
Not only is it reflected in some form in every State constitution, including STATE OF ILL (Illinois. Not our best State.), but they are Amendments I and II of the United States Constitution.
As a United States Citizen by Naturalization (Immigration), Mr. Garrett raised his right hand and swore an oath to “preserve, protect, and defend” the United States Constitution from “all enemies, foreign and domestic”, and that he made these promises “without mental reservation or purpose of evasion”.
Clearly, he said the words or he wouldn’t be granted US citizenship, but now he turns around and openly attacks the very bedrock of our nation’s highest law? The Bill of Rights!
In Europe, where he’s from, there are varying levels of democracy. When I say varying levels, I mean there is an elected government in most places, but nothing that says definitively what that government can’t do.
Many of their countries have no codified Constitution, many of them still have their monarchy like King Charles waving around his $400 million (USD) stolen African diamond in his scepter while waving at football games and sharing potato recipes (worth every penny), and almost none of these “old and mature democracies” have a guarantee of Freedom of Speech, much less the Right to Bear Arms.
The Founders of the United States were better men than you’ll find floating around this place today, and they had just left an oppressive system in Europe that still, to this day, has national religions, and criminal punishments for Free Speech.
In the United Kingdom, where Roy Schestowitz is from, not only can you be arrested for not being polite (and people wonder why they’re polite….), but you’re not allowed to have guns.
The government did this for a reason. When a government is going broke and wants to repeal your safety net and take away your living standard at whatever rate it chooses…..right in front of them lately (Roy was telling me how some grocery items have doubled in price practically overnight….It’s a bigger disaster than the supermarkets in the US.), the last thing the politicians want is to have to look over their shoulders while they’re doing it.
Even in the US, States with more gun control than others are seeing a steeper erosion in their living standard for the bottom 20%.
The politicians don’t pass this to protect you.
They pass it and then they say they’re cutting pensions again or no more food stamps or come back to the unemployment office when your hours at Walmart are literally cut in half and THEN you might get $5 a week.
I talked to Roy last night and mentioned that STATE OF ILL makes their unemployment offices hard to find.
They’re always out in the middle of nowhere, where there’s no public transit, two counties over, and 20 left in the State for 13 million people.
They never put any signs out making it obvious you’ve come to the right building.
It’s like that scene in the movie Men in Black where they’re hiding in a thing that says it’s part of the turnpike authority or something.
They want to hide from the public not only to make sure nobody wanders in, but to make it hard to live if you lose your job because you can’t figure out how to get there or afford the costs of going.
It seems that’s the same thing they do in the UK. The government is obligated by law to provide a stipend, maybe, but they’ll make you work for it to wear you down.
The United States gets a bad rap for “gun violence”, but truth be told, Europe isn’t exactly all that safe. There are travel advisories about handing over your wallet in Paris (no guns) to avoid getting stabbed on the train from the airport after you JUST GOT THERE.
But Members of Congress here have been shot at in notable incidents in the past decade, Republicans and Democrats alike. Truth is that nobody in this country likes the government and what’s going on in Washington especially.
This is inevitable when you’re dealing with a national government that represents a lot of States that really don’t have much in common with each other.
In the UK, they can just repeal your benefits, they can repeal your social security, they can foist whatever they want, and you have eggs to throw at their King, maybe, if you’re lucky.
Moving on, Mr. Garrett once said in Twitter that people in San Francisco “Get it.”. He said he liked living in San Francisco because they “Get it.”.
They’re infamous for being cruel to the homeless.
In Indiana, where I’m from, there are homeless shelters. There are programs to find them work and get them back on their feet in as little time as possible. It’s almost unheard of to see someone living under newspapers and eating out of trash, and whacking off in public and talking to buildings due to untreated mental illness.
If you come to Illinois or California, where the Democrats have total control of the government, it’s wall to wall public masturbators living under newspapers and talking to buildings.
In fact, just the other day when I was taking out the trash, I ran into one of them at my dumpster. He was talking to the dumpster and whacking off in front of it. I called the police, but they never showed up.
Lucky for the homeless, who have been so badly treated by “liberal” states and the few American cities with self-avowed Communists on the Board, San Francisco, Portland, and Seattle haven’t had much luck in court.
How do you get Communists on the Board and your rent is 2-6 times the national average?
Didn’t the actual Communists at least build buildings for people to live in instead of enacting zoning codes to make sure no affordable housing goes in and then issuing people tickets for parking in their own driveway?
We see how the people of San Francisco feel about the homeless, like the artsy fartsy guy with the artsy fartsy art gallery that turned a (presumably) artsy fartsy hose on one of them because he was sick of looking at her.
San Francisco. Where homeless people “get it”. The hose.
The Ninth Circuit Ruling is controlling in those states. It’s the largest appeals circuit in America. They made a ruling, the Thomas Ruling, that basically says “If the State isn’t doing enough to shelter the homeless, it can’t pretend that they willingly chose to sleep in a public place, and therefore cannot criminalize it.”
Who is challenging this ruling to the Republicans that Trump put on the Supreme Court? Not Indiana. Not Florida. Not Tennessee.
Why certainly it’s Texas, right? No.
It’s San Francisco. Where people “get it”. The hose.
I would be embarrassed and ashamed if I showed up in a country, asked them for the privilege of being a Citizen, and then one of my first official acts as such was to show my ass (figuratively) and mock their Constitution, which I had just sworn to uphold.
But it seems that some people have no appreciation of irony, good manners, or even the sense to keep it to themselves if they apparently made misrepresentations under oath.
Nothing says “Balls” like “I came to your country to ask for Citizenship and then now I’ll be an Internet Asshole that takes a shit on your founding ideals.”
The United States can’t do much about people who blast the Freedom of Speech because they have the right to Freedom of Speech here.
And yes, that is the same Freedom of Speech that allowed the Nazis to march in Skokie, but 40+ years later the Nazis are not well liked and don’t have a single member in the State or local governments in Illinois, even though they won their court case and were able to march in Skokie.
Letting them march is the lesser evil. It reminds people that they’re there and they need to be vigilant to make sure they don’t come to power.
Of course there are repercussions in the United States for being a Nazi, even though there is no law against it. If you openly admit it, you’re going to have a very hard time professionally. Nobody is going to elect you to anything.
In Germany, where there’s no strong freedom of speech, they outlawed Nazi symbols, and parties, and ideologies, outlawed it, and there are Nazis in their legislature that just don’t wear swastikas and call themselves that. So big difference. They’re in the legislature introducing bills and voting on things, where they can actually do a lot of harm, as long as they don’t use symbols.
This is my opinion of Matt, but I can’t figure out what else to call it when you say you support the Constitution and then go down the line saying that foundational pieces of it shouldn’t exist.
If you didn’t agree to live under it, then I don’t believe for a minute that you should have filed an N-400.
You must be logged in to post a comment.