I just don’t like what I’m seeing out there in Corporate America these days.
All signs to me have my spidey sense twitching that stagnation is going to end with a huge market crash sometime later in the year.
I hate to call what’s been going on “secular stagnation” because it would imply that there is no demand for goods and services. There’s actually a lot of demand, but it’s hard, with all of the layoffs and stagnant paychecks, to earn enough to fulfill this demand.
The reason that the Fed is hiking rates anyway while the Bureau of Labor Statistics has turned into something that would make Joseph Stalin proud, is that they created a mess with the “pandemic” “stimulus” and now they have to contain it.
During Stalin’s reign over the USSR, his Census officials brought him data that the population of the USSR had collapsed, so he had them all shot and the new ones brought him better figures.
While we’re not seeings American civil servants shot, we are seeing them lose THEIR jobs if the President doesn’t like what he sees.
In May of 2020, Trump had the BLS outright fake how many Americans had just lost their jobs in a single month, because the figures were horrific.
At the same time, he had the CDC model that only 56,000 Americans would die of COVID and that it would stop in August. We’ve lost over 1.5 million and COVID is still out there. My Grandmother in the nursing home just got it again.
When the Census was happening, Trump’s Census officials, true to their Stalinist inspiration, made absolutely no effort to count my spouse and me in Illinois, they didn’t even send us a form or a Census taker. Meanwhile, in states like Florida and Indiana, they had people driving around claiming that empty houses had entire families living in them.
And nothing, fundamentally, has improved, under Joe Biden. When the FDA was considering Aduhelm, their Scientific Advisory Panel voted almost unanimously against it. The FDA approved it anyway, nearly the entire Panel resigned, and they were replaced with more compliant officials.
My point, is, that in this day and age, you can trust little of what you see or hear.
Joe Biden has inherited all of the Organs of State that Donald Trump corrupted so badly, and uses them in the same manner.
The banking crisis last month is still bubbling under the surface, waiting to come back with a vengeance, while the officials pat themselves on the back for saving everybody.
Looking at the layoffs going on, the debt people are in, it’s clear that America is anything but a bunch of happy campers living in a well-adjusted country.
It’s a sad, sick, badly sick, place to live.
The stock market though, is stagnant. It’s been stagnant ever since Joe Biden has been in office. When you deduct the banking fees to manage my spouse’s 401(k) plan, there’s been no gains at all.
Given the limited fund options, I decided to execute a sell order for all of the S&P 500 ETF shares last night, purchase 100% shares in the Bond Index Fund which tracks the Bloomberg Barclays Aggregate Bond Index, and call it good.
This fund took massive losses last year while the Fed was hiking rates. Down nearly 16%.
Will the Fed continue hiking? Perhaps. But there’s starting to be a lot of arguments among Fed officials as to whether and by how much they can continue to get away with this before things blow up.
I think the fund has oversold and it’s still a very good value right now. If there are more Fed hikes, I think they will be muted (25 basis points at a time) for at least a while, as they try to gauge what the market response to all of this is.
The rapid hikes over the last 11 months or so jolted the Bond markets and rattled investors, because it caused “losses” in the form of making bonds paying lower rates sell at a steep discount to compensate what investors could make by buying newly issued bonds at higher rates.
Now that this has returned to something closer to undervalued to maybe fair value, the small rate hikes shouldn’t agitate the funds that much anymore, considering that the duration of the holdings averages 5-7 years, and so you have old bonds that the fund booked a loss on rolling off and being replaced with better bonds that lock in higher rates.
My primary concern is inflation risk, but that’s a risk where you don’t make enough in the fund to compensate for inflation.
This is not much of a concern when stock funds are doing poorly anyway, because you make no money there and inflation is still happening.
This is offset by the fact that the Bond Index Fund has a much lower expense ratio than the S&P 500 ETF. Every quarter, the bank statements assess a small fee for managing the funds, and the fee for being in the Bond Index Fund is about 150 times lower than the S&P 500 ETF. It’s not a huge difference with what we have in the account at this point, but it is something. The bank itself is a drag on your retirement.
What about default risk in bonds?
Well, first of all, the primary component (43% iirc) is United States federal government bonds, so those are quite safe.
The rest are a mix of corporate, state and local government debts, mortgage-backed securities, etc.
The good news is that when a bankruptcy happens in a corporation, if there is any money left, the bondholders get paid first. Then, and only then, if there is anything left, do stockholders get anything. For them it will be pennies, but they have a greater chance of being completely wiped out.
As it stands, the default rate in the AGG is only 1.01%. It’s quite low.
Even assuming no returns at all this year, why dial up your pretax 401(k) anyway?
I dialed my spouse’s up to 14% on his side. His employer will match 6%. We had been taking the 6%, but he just got a raise, our fixed-income investments at the bank (CDs) and bonds are earning more lately, and this is all taxable income on our 1040 at the end of the year.
In addition, there have been some massive class action settlements, mostly related to the Illinois BIPA, and the Facebook Cambridge Analytics Scandal.
I expect that this might push us over the AGI to claim the full $1,000 of the Retirement SAVERS Tax Credit, which is something the IRS puts out to encourage lower income workers to save for retirement.
So if you shove more money into your pretax account at work, it lowers your AGI, and you can still qualify for the credit, even if your “Social Security and Medicare Income” on your W-2 are still a fair bit higher.
Traditional 401(k) pretax contributions are not the only way to get your AGI down.
Much of the insurance your employer offers can do it too, including health, dental, and vision premiums in many cases. If your employer offers you the choice, take the pretax premiums.
(Why are your Social Security and Medicare earnings still taxed at the full gross income level? Well, be glad they are! Your earnings record is how Social Security determines what to pay you when you claim it.)
For older couples where one is still working and the other gets Social Security, or people who get Social Security and still have W-2 income, the case for doing pretax 401(k) contributions is greater.
See, the more your earned income on the tax return goes up (from either spouse or for you if you’re single), the more Social Security income becomes taxable.
Using pre-tax 401(k) contributions and putting in more, you can “bend the curve” and bring down your taxable Social Security benefits at the same time.
Here’s a calculator so you can try that yourself.
Most low income workers completely ignore the tax benefits of 401(k) accounts.
You should always aim to be under the maximum AGI (which those pretax contributions can get you to even if you make more!) for the Retirement SAVERS Credit, even if it puts a pinch on your household finances or you have to break open something like those No Penalty CDs I’ve been buying up with our Savings.
That $1,000 credit comes directly, dollar-for-dollar, off your tax obligation at the end of the year (but it’s not refundable, so you can’t go below $0, although if you get to $0 and still had refundable credits, it could get you another $1000 because the refundable credits would start from $0 and keep going!).
In our case, it leaves us with an annual tax obligation to the feds of a few hundred instead of well north of a thousand, because we can lower the AGI using top of the line deductions.
Does it mean that we don’t go to Disney World and lay out $8,000 and come back to reality with banks and hospitals on the phone wondering where their money is?
Yes, we live within our means. We don’t “buy nothing”, but I make sure that our accounts are in order.
Even low income workers should save for retirement and do some financial planning, it’s not that hard.
We have no debts, we have a low tax obligation, and we have money in retirement funds.
Meanwhile, my in-laws…. My sister-in-law has three jobs, her husband has two I think. They make several hundred thousand a year. They make no headway with the 7 credit cards, the mortgage with the property tax bill that goes skyrocketing every year because it’s Illinois, the two kids that cost them millions of dollars and contribute nothing to the household budget, and the three car payments and repair bills.
It’s easier to have a good head on your shoulder for finances than it is to be a five job, two kid, no income household.
You must be logged in to post a comment.